[Networkit] Taking my leave

Christian Staudt christian.staudt at kit.edu
Fri Apr 22 15:03:18 CEST 2016

Thank you all for the kind feedback.

Note that we have documented best practices for development, maintenance and release in the dev guide and release checklist (see attachment). They are also in the repository as markdown documents.

For information on the Cython interface, also consider these slides:  [1]


[1]: https://cloud.iti.kit.edu/index.php/s/0DGlMdWhSRk80Se

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de/mailman/private/networkit/attachments/20160422/6f5c1a22/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de/mailman/private/networkit/attachments/20160422/6f5c1a22/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------

> On 22 Apr 2016, at 14:37, Henning Meyerhenke <henning.meyerhenke at kit.edu> wrote:
> Dear NetworKit users and developers,
> I would like to thank Christian for his very good job as maintainer and
> main developer as well.
> Of course, the ParCo group at KIT will continue to drive the development
> of NetworKit, in particular with our algorithm engineering efforts for
> network analysis. NetworKit is and will be an integral part of our
> research and teaching infrastructure.
> I have asked our group member Elisabetta Bergamini to take over from
> Christian. She has used NetworKit extensively in her research and will
> be responsible for managing future releases. Transferring academic
> projects to the next generation of PhD students is not always easy, but
> I am certain we will succeed with NetworKit.
> If you encounter problems with NetworKit, the mailing list will be the
> first address for corresponding reports. We hope we can maintain the
> same high responsiveness that Christian, our student assistant Max, and
> many other contributors guaranteed so far.
> Best regards,
> Henning
> Am 22.04.16 um 13:56 schrieb Raphael C:
>> Dear Chris,
>> As a normal (npn-dev) user I would first like to say thank you for
>> all your work. I would also like to say how valuable and rare high
>> performance graph tools designed to work with massive datasets on
>> single (although multi-core) computers are.  In python, as you will
>> know, there is igraph and networkx but the former is slightly
>> moribund and the latter is not designed to scale.  Other than that
>> one is forced to use spark but this can he hugely inefficient when
>> graphs with billions of nodes can be processed on a single
>> multi-core computer.
>> In short, I think there is a strong need for a tool such as
>> networkit and I am very grateful it exists.
>> Best wishes, Raphael
>> On 22 April 2016 at 09:04, Christian Staudt
>> <christian.staudt at kit.edu> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I finished my thesis this week, which seems like a good moment to
>>> officially take my leave as maintainer of the project. First of
>>> all, thanks to all contributors, who have invested countless hours
>>> in sum.
>>> For NetworKit we have followed a model that is not (yet) the norm
>>> for academic software - we have invested time into usability,
>>> documentation, packaging, distribution and support. As a result,
>>> NetworKit has something like a small user base, judging from the
>>> couple of researchers from all over the world sending us the
>>> occasional feedback.
>>> No doubts that we've created a useful resource to build research
>>> projects on. I wish I had something like NetworKit when I started
>>> my PhD research - such a code base could have saved me months.  On
>>> the other hand it has been very educational for everyone involved
>>> to build this from the ground up.
>>> I also think that such a code base is in fact, in the long run, a
>>> depletable resource that requires regular maintenance to stay
>>> useful.
>>> At this point in the development, there is still a backlog of
>>> various ideas for improvement. That includes yet another algorithm
>>> that could be added, as well as overall improvements that make
>>> NetworKit a better data analysis tool. However, personally I'm not
>>> convinced that there is enough demand out there that justifies
>>> working hard to take the tool suite to the next level now, since we
>>> are operating in a relatively narrow academic niche. That's why I'm
>>> going to turn to other projects.
>>> Thanks again to all contributors for making this work, Chris
>>> _______________________________________________ NetworKit mailing
>>> list NetworKit at ira.uni-karlsruhe.de
>>> https://lists.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de/mailman/listinfo/networkit
>> _______________________________________________ NetworKit mailing
>> list NetworKit at ira.uni-karlsruhe.de
>> https://lists.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de/mailman/listinfo/networkit
> --
> ==========================================================
> Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
> Institute of Theoretical Informatics (ITI)
> Prof. Dr. Henning Meyerhenke
> Theoret. Informatics / Parallel Computing
> Phone: +49-721-608-41876
> Web: http://parco.iti.kit.edu/henningm/
> KIT - The Research University in the Helmholtz Association
> ==========================================================
> _______________________________________________
> NetworKit mailing list
> NetworKit at ira.uni-karlsruhe.de
> https://lists.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de/mailman/listinfo/networkit

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de/mailman/private/networkit/attachments/20160422/6f5c1a22/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the NetworKit mailing list